Monthly Archives: April 2008

I have been a Mac user since 1998. My first Mac was a Powermac 6100, and then I upgraded to the 7200. Then I graduated to a G4 iBook. I have a G3 tower collecting dust. I like using OS X over Windows, but I don’t like how proprietary Apple is becoming, with their hardware, software, and media formats. My current favorite thing is my Ubuntu box. I’m over the biggest part of the hump as far as the learning curve goes. I like that Ubuntu is a reliable, open source, Unix-based OS that I can install on any hardware I want. Since Apple switched to Intel processors, there have been a number of people who have successfully installed both patched and native versions of Apple’s current OS, Leopard. This is beautiful for two reasons:

  1. Complete hardware freedom. Instead of paying for something that is hardwired and underspec-ed, or paying exorbitant amounts of money to use the same hardware found in any pc, a person can buy whatever components they want and run OS X, just like Windows (ugh) or Linux (yay!).
  2. This is really part of the same idea, but cost is definitely a factor. Cheaper hardware with OS X software.

Well, now someone has made it even easier to afford an OS X system on non-Apple hardware. Psystar has been all over the news. For $400, you can get a machine that will allow you to install Leopard on it as if it were an official Apple hardware product. Pretty sweet.

This might be a scam. Dammit.

And someone has finally has made the hardware to use the iPod Touch as a VOIP device using the built in wifi. Read all about that here.

Once again, I’m sharing some of the notes I have been compiling based on my study of Saito Sensei’s Buki waza. These notes are on some of the Jo movements that are not specifically detailed in the Jo Suburi. I have found that an understanding of these movements increase my comfort level and authority when studying the Kumi practices. These are basically movements found in the Kumi practice, some practiced regularly solo, some not, and some that are bunkai. As always, I welcome corrections and suggestions. The nomenclature is the best that I could do. These descriptions refer to Saito’s weapon system, so if you are unfamiliar to them, they won’t make any sense, I’m afraid. Lastly, let me say that I am not speaking as an authority on the subject at all. I would be ever grateful for anyone with knowledge on the subject to give me feedback. All that being said:

Additional Jo Movements
These movements appear in the 31 Jo partner practice and also in the Ken Jo No Riai, but are not highlighted in the suburi. Where I could not find terms, I “improvised.” Any corrections or suggestions are welcome.

Choku Barai – The straight or direct parry. This is the first of three basic parries, usually done from Tsuki No Kamae. It is used to parry both middle level and high level strikes. In the second kumijo, for example, this movement is used from a “Jo No Kamae” in a manner that specfically counters a thrust to the face.

Kaeshi Barai – The reversing sweeping parry. The second of three basic parries. This parry is done in accord to a change in hanmi, and can be done with backward or forward movement. Usually, Kaeshi Barai is done to parry a high strike, with low level parries falling into the category of Gedan Barai.

Kaiten Barai – The rotary sweeping parry. This is the Hasso movement performed on both sides. What makes this movement distinct from the Hasso Gaeshi series is my next matter of inquiry. Essentially, it is practiced as a continuation from the Kaeshi Barai movement, and the relationship between the two should be studied closely.

Maki Otoshi Barai – The wrapping sweep-down parry. I use this term to describe the movement that uchijo uses in to parry Movement 3 in the 31 Kumijo.
Jodan Dome Barai – Upper level parry. This describes Movement 2 in the 31 Kumijo.
Jodan Dome Maki Otoshi – Upper level parry that strikes down. This is the movement in the 31 Kumijo “between” 2 and 3, that is “hidden” in the 31 Jo Kata.

Jodan Gaeshi – Upper level parry that changes to uchikomi. In the suburi we have Tsuki Jodan Gaeshi, but in the partner practices, a thurst does not always preceed this motion.
Jodan Uchikomi Barai – High parry that looks like uchikomi. This parry occurs frequently, when the Jo is brought down as in Uchikomi, but used as a parry. A good example is Movement 30 in the 31 Jo Kata, which is a parry, not a strike.

Gedan Uchikomi Barai – Low parry that looks like uchikomi. This looks like (Tsuki) Gedan Gaeshi, but is used to parry, rather than strike.

Gedan Dome Barai – Lower parry. This describes the parry that ukejo uses in San No Kumijo against Gedan Choku Tsuki. I say “Gedan Barai” simply because there is no “Gaeshi” preceding it. Otherwise, the motion looks just like Tsuki Gedan Gaeshi.

Gedan Gaeshi Barai – Low parry that looks like gedan gaeshi. Same deal with “Jodan Uchikomi Barai,” parrying low instead of striking.

Chudan Gaeshi – Middle level jo-reversing parry. My favorite subject of study. This is the second parry used in San No Kumijo. This movement happens in so many sneaky ways. It’s a parry, it’s a switch, it’s a recovery after one’s “Gyake Tsuki” is warded off. This has a relation to Hasso Gaeshi Tsuki, the way the Jo is brought back to Hasso after the thrust.

Hasso Barai – Parry that is followed with hasso kamae. This sneaky little devil. This pops up in the 31 Kumijo when uchijo parries the thrust that is Movement 28. Uchijo, after parrying with Migi Gedan Gaeshi Barai, moves to Hidari Hasso Gaeshi No Kamae, sneaking this parry in the middle of the two movements. This is one of those movements where two moves in the solo practice become one in the partner practice (28 and 29). I know that there are other ways uchijo does this, but, I am not familiar with them.

I just finished this book today. I just wanted to restate my feelings about the book here:

This is the sort of book that writers write, and that writers read. It is the sort of thing that a fool about love would enjoy, because it makes being such a fool excusable. It is extremely well written, and I really mean that. I just fault the rather malevolent premise, that real love, although eloquently described, is so unattainable in the world of the narrator. I did not enjoy the highlighting of the anti-hero, and I found the “ending” trite. I would not recommend reading this for the story, and I cannot recommend reading it for the eloquent passages, because frankly, words are supposed to mean something, and that is not amenable, ever.

This is the sort of thing that I look to books and art for in order to avoid. Show me your strength, your courage, your victory, your happiness. I don’t need to read about a person who can’t take the time to ground themselves, and seeks out self-esteem from the genitalia of others – no matter how well it is written.

Demo version of New Order\’s \”Dream attack\”

I don’t want to comment on this until I can verify that it is in fact a demo version and not a fan remix, but it’s great.